Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and the Transform Limit

Posted on 2008-06-13. Permanent link: http://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2008_06_13.html

Author: Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Ref.: encyclopedia articles on transform limit, bandwidth-limited pulses, time–bandwidth product, Spotlight article of 2007-10-11: "Understanding Fourier Spectra"

Optical pulses are subject to the well-known transform limit: for a given pulse duration, there is a minimum spectral bandwidth (width of the Fourier spectrum). This limit is sometimes connected with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, saying (in one form) that the more well-defined the time of some process is, the bigger the uncertainty on the involved energy transfer.

This does sound somewhat similar, taking into account that energy is related to frequency in quantum mechanics, and Fourier transform pairs are involved in both cases. Nevertheless, it is nonsense to claim that the transform limit for pulses is strongly related to Heisenberg's uncertainty limit. After all, we are dealing with two very different issues:

• The involved property of Fourier transform pairs (that stronger localization of one partner implies weaker localization of the other one) is a purely mathematical issue, which has been known for a long time and is in no way controversial.
• On the other hand, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a piece of physics, which was revolutionary at its time, and is still not accepted by everybody. Heisenberg's reasoning does of course use quite a bit of mathematics, including properties of Fourier transform pairs. This cannot disguise, however, that essentially it is physics, making statements on nature, rather than mathematics.

In conclusion, there is a vague similarity, nothing more. The transform limit has essentially nothing to do with quantum mechanics (or quantum optics).

Another question would be whether it was a good idea to call Heisenberg's uncertainty principle a principle. But before making too many enemies, including famous (dead) physicists, I stop the discussion at this point!