# RP Coating – Advanced Software for

Designing Optical Multilayer Structures

Overview | Purpose | Model | Interface | Demos | Versions |

## Demo File: Gires–Tournois interferometer

Here, we analyze the characteristics of a Gires–Tournois interferometer, which could be used for dispersion compensation in a mode-locked laser, for example. It consists of a Bragg mirror, one thicker layer and a thin top layer. Effectively, it is like a Fabry–Pérot interferometer operated in reflection, where the back mirror has a high reflectivity. The overall reflectivity is then high for all wavelengths in some range, and is hardly affected by the resonances. Due to the interference effect from the top mirror, however, one obtains a periodic variation of the phase change and thus chromatic dispersion.

We first describe the structure:

d_units: nm l_units: nm l_Bragg := 1000 { Bragg wavelength } N_Bragg := 10 { no layer pairs } d_t := 3.25 * l_Bragg / n_SiO2(l_Bragg * l_units) { thickness of thick SiO2 layer } beam from superstrate substrate: BK7 for j := 1 to N_Bragg do begin * TiO2, l / 4 at l_Bragg * SiO2, l / 4 at l_Bragg end * SiO2, d = d_t * TiO2, l / 4 at l_Bragg superstrate: air

The first diagram shows the reflectivity profile:

diagram 1: "Reflectivity Profile" x: 800, 1200 "wavelength (nm)", @x y: 0, 100 "transmissivity (%)", @y frame hx hy f: 100 * R(x), color = red, width = 3, step = 1

A second diagram shows the group delay versus wavelength, which is highest on the resonances:

diagram 2: "Group Delay in Reflection" x: 800, 1200 "wavelength (nm)", @x y: -150, +150 "T_g (fs)", @y frame hx hy clip f: T_g_r(x) / fs, color = green, width = 3 f: CS_y1 + R(x) * (CS_y2 - CS_y1), style = dotted f: 0

The third diagram plots the group delay dispersion as a function of wavelength:

diagram 3: "Group Delay Dispersion" x: 800, 1200 "wavelength (nm)", @x y: -2000, +2000 "GDD (fs^2)", @y frame hx hy clip f: GDD_t(x) / fs^2, color = blue, width = 3, step = 1, maxconnect = 1 f: CS_y1 + R(x) * (CS_y2 - CS_y1), style = dotted f: 0

Next we look at intensity patterns versus wavelength:

diagram 4: x: 800, 1200 "wavelength (nm)", @x y: -500, d_tot + 1500 "depth in the mirror structure (nm)", @y frame ! begin { show the color scale } var x1, x2; x1 := CS_x2 + 0.02 * (CS_x2 - CS_x1); x2 := CS_x2 + 0.04 * (CS_x2 - CS_x1); for y := CS_y1 to CS_y2 step (CS_y2 - CS_y1) / 500 do begin setcolor(colorscale((y - CS_y1) / (CS_y2 - CS_y1))); line(x1 + i * y,x2 + i * y); end; setcolor(black); end ! (set_dir(1); R(lambda_t)) cp: colorscale((R(x); E2(y) / 4)) { color plot } ; Show the layer boundaries: f: get_z(j), style = solid, color = lightgray, for j := 1 to nolayers() f: 0 f: get_z(nolayers() + 1) "substrate", 200c, (-200)c "superstrate", 150, (d_tot + 200)c

One can see that the reflection phase changes rapidly around the resonances, but stays approximately constant in other regions.

Finally, we simulate the propagation of an ultrashort pulse through the structure.
Although **RP Coating** has no explicit functions for such purposes, we can do that with a few lines of script code.
We define some arrays for the time- and frequency-dependent complex amplitudes, also for the complex electric field in the whole structure for all optical frequencies (for later use, see below).
Then we do the actual calculation and display the reflected pulse:

diagram 5: "Reflection of Ultrashort Pulse" x: -200, +200 "time (fs)", @x y: -1, 1 "electric field strength (a. u.)", @y frame hx hy ; Parameters of the test pulse: A0 := 0.9 { peak amplitude } tau0 := 10 fs { FWHM duration } l0 := 1000 nm { center wavelength } f0 := c / l0 { center frequency } A0%(t) := A0 / cosh(1.76 * t / tau0) { complex amplitude in time domain } E0(t) := Re(A0%(t) * expi(-2pi * f0 * t)) { electric field } ["l0 = ", l0:d3:"(n)m", ", tau0 = ", tau0:d3:"s", ", T_g = ", T_g_r(l0 / l_units):d3:"s", ", GDD = ", GDD_r(l0 / l_units) / fs^2:f0:"fs^2"] ; Numerical parameters: T := 3000 fs N := 2^10 dt := T / N t1 := -T / 2 + dt t2 := T / 2 df := 1 / T f2 := (N / 2) * df f1 := -f2 + df f_max := 1 / dt - df defarray A%[0, T - dt, dt] (periodic) { amplitudes in time domain } defarray A0_f%[0, f_max, df] (periodic) { amplitudes in frequency domain } defarray A_f%[0, f_max, df] (periodic) { amplitudes in frequency domain } z_max := d_tot * d_units + 3 um dz := 30 nm dz := z_max / round(z_max / dz) defarray E%[0, z_max, dz; f1, f2, df] calc begin for t := t1 to t2 step dt do A%[t] := A0%(t); FFT_n(A%[], A0_f%[], +1); for f := f1 to f2 step df do begin A_f%[f] := r%(c / (f0 + f) / l_units) * A0_f%[f]; for z := 0 to z_max step dz do E%[z,f] := E_plus%(z / d_units) + E_minus%(z / d_units); end; FFT_n(A_f%[], A%[], -1); end A%(t) := A%~[t] { final amplitude } E(t) := Re(A%(t) * expi(-2pi * f0 * t)) I(z,t) := { intensity at position z and time t } begin var E%; E% := sum(f := f1 to f2 step df, A0_f%[f] * E%[z,f] * expi(-2pi * (f0 + f) * t)); abs2(E%) / N; end f: E0(x * fs), color = lightgray, step = 1 f: E(x * fs), color = blue, step = 1 f: abs(A0%(x * fs)), color = lightgray, step = 1 { envelope of initial pulse } f: -abs(A0%(x * fs)), color = lightgray, step = 1 f: abs(A%(x * fs)), color = blue, step = 1 { envelope of final pulse } f: -abs(A%(x * fs)), color = blue, step = 1

As the chosen input pulse (blue curve) is rather short, we obtain a sequence of output pulses:

The next diagram shows the time-resolved field intensity distribution:

diagram 6: "Ultrashort Pulse in the GTI Structure" x: -50, +100 "t (fs)", @x y: 0, z_max / um "z (µm)", @y frame hx hy ! I_max := maxf(I(z,0), z in [0, z_max], xtol = 0.1 nm, divide = round(10 * z_max / l0)) cp: colorscale(I(y * um,x * fs) / I_max) "air", 100, (d_tot * nm / um + 0.3)c f: d_tot * nm / um { indicate the surface of the GTI } "GTI", 100, (d_tot * nm / um - 0.3)c

One can see how the incoming pulse (upper left part) causes a first reflected pulse at the input face, then a stronger pulse via reflection at the bottom Bragg mirror, and further weaker pulses which do multiple round trips in the structure. For the given very short input pulse, these reflected pulses stay well separated in time. Normally, a GTI would be used with much longer pulses, so that all reflected pulses overlap strongly in time. In that situation, the pulse bandwidth is smaller than the bandwidth of the GTI resonances.