RP Photonics logo
RP Photonics
Modeling & Design Software
Technical consulting services on lasers, nonlinear optics, fiber optics etc.
Profit from the knowledge and experience of a top expert!
Powerful simulation and design software.
Make computer models in order to get a comprehensive understanding of your devices!
Success comes from understanding – be it in science or in industrial development.
The famous Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology – available online for free!
The ideal place for finding suppliers for many photonics products.
Advertisers: Make sure to have your products displayed here!
powerful tools for efficient laser development and laser science
This page gives you an overview on our software products.
RP Fiber Calculator is a convenient tool for calculations on optical fibers.
RP Fiber Power is an extremely flexible tool for designing and optimizing fiber devices.
RP Resonator is a particularly flexible tool for laser resonator design.
RP ProPulse can simulate the pulse evolution e.g. in mode-locked lasers and sync-pumped OPOs.
RP Coating is a particularly flexible design tool for dielectric multilayer systems.
RP Q-switch can simulate the power evolution in Q-switched lasers.
Most of our software products support a powerful script language, which gives you an extraordinary degree of flexibility.
Here you learn about software license conditions, updates and upgrades, etc.
Competent technical support is a key quality associated with software from RP Photonics.
RP Photonics has distributors in various countries.
The RP Photonics Software News keep you updated on our developments and give the users additional interesting hints.
Here you can make inquiries e.g. concerning technical details, prices and quotations.
en | de

RP Coating – Advanced Software for
Designing Optical Multilayer Structures

Demo File: Polarizing Cube of MacNeille Design

Here, we design a thin-film polarizer in the form of a polarizing cube, where the multilayer thin-film coating is embedded between two 45° prisms.

The basic idea of the common MacNeille cube design is to eliminate the reflection for p polarization by having Brewster's angle at all internal interfaces. It is then easy to obtain high reflectivity for s polarization with a simple Bragg mirror design without introducing a significant reflection for p polarization. The Brewster angle condition requires that a substrate material with suitable refractive index (for given coating materials) is chosen. For the outer interfaces, one requires anti-reflection coatings, which are not considered here.

polarizing cube

We seek for a design working well between 900 nm and 1200 nm. First we need to choose the materials. If we decide for TiO2 and SiO2 layers in the coating, we need a substrate material with a suitable refractive index in order to meet the above-mentioned Brewster condition. We use an equation for calculating the optimum substrate index, and have found that Schott SF11 glass comes relatively close:

d_units: nm
l_units: nm
 
l := 1064  { operation wavelength }
 
n_L := n_SiO2(l * l_units)
n_H := n_TiO2(l * l_units)
n_S_opt := n_H * n_L / sqrt(n_H^2 + n_L^2) / sin(theta)
  { optimum substate index for a MaxNeille polarizer }
show "n_S_opt:   ", n_S_opt:f3
n_S(l) := n_SF11(l)  { chosen substrate material }
n_S := n_S(l * l_units)
show "n_S:       ", n_S:f3

We then implement the basic design:

theta_L := arcsin(n_S * sin(theta) / n_L)
d_L := (l / n_L / 4) / cos(theta_L)
theta_H := arcsin(n_S * sin(theta) / n_H)
d_H := (l / n_H / 4) / cos(theta_H)
N_Bragg := 4  { number of layer pairs }
 
beam from superstrate
substrate: S
for j := 1 to N_Bragg do
begin
* SiO2, d = d_L, d_max = 2 * d_L
* TiO2, d = d_H, d_max = 2 * d_H
end
* SiO2, d = d_L, d_max = 2 * d_L
superstrate: S

Then we define a figure-of-merit function describing the design goal:

FOM() := sum(l := 900 to 1200 step 5,
       sum(dtheta := -2 deg to +2 deg step 0.5 deg,
  R_p(l,theta + dtheta)^2 + 10 * T_s(l,theta + dtheta)^2))

Here, we consider some range of angles, and use a 10 times larger weight for the transmission for s polarization. (Such parameters can depend on the concrete requirements.)

We can then use a simple local optimization to further improve the performance:

optimize coating for minimum of FOM()

The first diagram made shows the reflectivity profile:

diagram 1:
 
"Reflectivity Profile"
 
["Merit value: ", FOM():d3]
 
x: 400, 2000
"wavelength (nm)", @x, size = %5
y: 0, 100
"reflectivity (%)", @y, size = %5
frame
hx
hy
legpos 420, 150
 
f: 100 * R_s(x, theta), "s polarization",
  color = red, width = 3, step = 1
 
f: 100 * R_p(x, theta), "p polarization", style = dashed,
  color = red, width = 3, step = 1
 
! begin
    setcolor(gray);
    line(l,l + i * CS_y2)
  end
reflectivity profile of a thin-film polarizing cube

We then test the sensitivity to angle changes:

diagram 2:
 
"Variation of the Angle of Incidence"
 
x: 40, 50
"angle of incidence (°)", @x
y: 0, 100
"reflectivity (%)", @y
frame
hx
hy
 
f: 100 * R_s(l, x * deg), "s polarization",
  color = red, width = 3
f: 100 * R_p(l, x * deg), "p polarization",
  color = red, width = 3, style = dashed
angular sensitivity of a thin-film polarizing cube

We see that a good performance is obtained only in a relatively narrow range of angles, which is typical for such designs.

Finally, we show the design of the obtained structure:

diagram 3:
 
x: -500, get_d(0) + 500
"position (nm)", @x
y: 0, 3
"refractive index (nm)", @y
frame
 
! begin
    for j := 1 to nolayers() do
    begin
      var g;
      g := if get_material$(j) = "TiO2" then 0.8 else 0.9;
      setcolor(rgb(g, g, g));
      box(get_z(j), get_z(j + 1) + i * CS_y2);
    end;
    draw_cs(); { draw the coordinate system again }
  end
 
[get_d(j):f0:"nm"],
  (get_z(j) + 0.5 * get_d(j))c, (0.1 * CS_y2)b, direction = 90,
  for j := 1 to nolayers()
"substrate", (-200)c, (0.1 * CS_y2)b, direction = 90
"superstrate", (get_d(0) + 200)c, (0.1 * CS_y2)b, direction = 90
 
f: n(x,l), step = 1, color = blue
design of a thin-film polarizing cube
arrow