Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

VLib
Virtual
Library
Sponsorship opportunity: support this popular resource, which serves the whole photonics community, and get recognition!

Irradiance

Definition: the radiant flux (optical power) per unit area

Alternative term: flux density

German: Bestrahlungsstärke, Intensität

Categories: general optics, light detection and characterization, optical metrology

Formula symbol: Ee

Units: W/m2, W/cm2

How to cite the article; suggest additional literature

Author:

Irradiance (or flux density) is a term of radiometry and is defined as the radiant flux (optical power = energy per unit time) received by some surface per unit area. In the SI system, it is specified in units of W/m2 (watts per square meter).

In the context of laser technology, the common term optical intensity has the same units as the irradiance. It is not the same quantity, however. It is important to realize that the intensity is defined as the amount of energy going through an area perpendicular to the beam, while irradiance refers to what amount of energy arrives on a certain surface. The irradiance caused by a laser beam, for example, which hits a workpiece under some angle α against normal direction, is the beam intensity times cos α. The irradiance is thus generally smaller than the beam intensity.

One should also avoid confusion of optical intensity with the term radiant intensity, which has a different meaning: the radiant flux per unit solid angle.

A related quantity is the spectral irradiance, which is the irradiance per unit frequency or wavelength interval. It has units of W / (m2 Hz) or W / (m2 nm), for example.

The related term radiance essentially means irradiance per unit solid angle, apart from a cos θ factor.

See also: radiometry, optical intensity, optical power, photometers, radiance
and other articles in the categories general optics, light detection and characterization, optical metrology

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Comments:

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

arrow