# LP Modes

Author: the photonics expert Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

Definition: linearly polarized modes of optical fibers with radially symmetric index profiles in the approximation of weak guidance

More general term: modes of optical fibers

The transverse refractive index profiles of many optical fibers are radially symmetric, i.e., the refractive index depends only on the radial coordinate <$r$> and not on the azimuthal coordinate <$\varphi$>. Also, the index profiles of nearly all fibers (except for photonic crystal fibers) exhibit only a small index contrast, so that the fiber can be assumed to be only weakly guiding. In this situation, the calculation of the fiber modes is greatly simplified. One obtains the linearly polarized LP modes.

In cases with stronger guidance, one would need to distinguish TE and TM modes, where only either the electric or the magnetic field is exactly perpendicular to the fiber axis. There are also *hybrid modes* of HE and EH type, having a non-zero longitudinal components of both electric and magnetic field. That case of *not* weakly guiding fibers applies, for example, to nanofibers where a glass/air interface provides the waveguide function.

## Passive Fiber Optics | single-mode, multimode fibers, polarization, chromatic dispersion, nonlinearities

Part 2: Fiber Modes | Core

We explain the basics of fiber modes, having self-reproducing amplitude profiles.

## Case Study: Mode Structure of a Multimode Fiber

We explore various properties of guided modes of multimode fibers. We also test how the mode structure of such a fiber reacts to certain changes of the index profile, e.g. to smoothening of the index step.

## Calculation of LP Modes

The wave equation for the complex electric field profile <$E(r,\varphi )$> in cylindrical coordinates is:

$$\frac{{{\partial ^2}E}}{{\partial {r^2}}} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{{\partial E}}{{\partial r}} + \frac{1}{{{r^2}}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}E}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}E}}{{\partial {z^2}}} + {k^2}E = 0$$where <$k = 2\pi n / \lambda$> is the wavenumber resulting for the local refractive index <$n$> and the vacuum wavelength <$\lambda$>. In a fiber, that quantity is usually spatially varying – and under our specific assumptions only dependent on the radial coordinate <$r$>.

Looking for modes with phase constant <$\beta$> (imaginary part of the propagation constant, still to be determined for a given vacuum wavelength <$\lambda$>), we obtain:

$$\frac{{{\partial ^2}E}}{{\partial {r^2}}} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{{\partial E}}{{\partial r}} + \frac{1}{{{r^2}}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}E}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}} + ({k^2} - {\beta ^2})E = 0$$Due to the radial symmetry, we can use the ansatz

$$E(r,\varphi ) = {F_{\ell m}}(r)\;\cos (\ell \varphi )$$where <$\ell$> needs to be an integer ( because otherwise the <$\varphi$>-dependent factor would not be continuous). We can use the same ansatz with a factor <$\sin \ell \varphi$> instead of <$\cos \ell \varphi$>, or in fact some linear combination of those, or use <$\exp(\pm i \ell \varphi )$>, but the resulting radial equation is in any case

$${F_{\ell m}}''(r) + \frac{{{F_{\ell m}}'(r)}}{r} + \left( {{n^2}(r)\;{k^2} - \frac{{{\ell ^2}}}{{{r^2}}} - {\beta ^2}} \right){F_{\ell m}}(r) = 0$$For a given wavelength, only for certain discrete values of <$\beta$> the radial equation has solutions which converge towards zero for <$r \rightarrow \infty$>. Only such solutions can represent guided modes of the fiber. These <$\beta$> values corresponding to guided modes are called <$\beta_{\ell m}$>, where <$\ell$> is the selected azimuthal index (see above) and the index <$m$> starts from 1 (for the highest possible <$\beta$> value) and ranges to some maximum value, which tends to decrease for increasing <$\ell$>. Once <$\ell$> gets too high, there are no solutions at all. Unfortunately, there are no analytical solutions for the eigenvalues (even for step-index profiles), but one can employ numerical methods. One can then find all guided modes by starting with <$\ell = 0$>, finding all <$\beta$> values for that, and then do this for increasing <$\ell$> values until there are no solutions anymore.

### Calculation for Step-index Fibers

For the more specific case of step-index fibers (where the refractive index is constant within the fiber core), analytical solutions for the core and cladding part of the radial equation can be found. The core part involves a Bessel function <$J_{\ell}(u r / r_\textrm{core})$>, and the cladding part a modified Bessel function <$K_{\ell}(w \: r / r_\textrm{core}))$>, where

$$u = {r_{{\rm{core}}}}\sqrt {n_{{\rm{core}}}^{\rm{2}}{k^2} - {\beta ^2}} $$and

$$w = {r_{{\rm{core}}}}\sqrt {{\beta ^2} - n_{{\rm{cl}}}^{\rm{2}}{k^2}} $$The prefactors for the core and cladding part must be balanced such that the function is continuous at the core/cladding interface.

One recognizes easily that

$${u^2} + {w^2} = r_{{\rm{core}}}^{\rm{2}}\left( {n_{{\rm{core}}}^{\rm{2}} - n_{{\rm{cl}}}^{\rm{2}}} \right){k^2} = {\left( {k\;{r_{{\rm{core}}}}\;{\rm{NA}}} \right)^2}$$where NA is the numerical aperture.

## Properties of the LP Modes

### Step-index Fibers

All guided modes have <$\beta$> values which lie between the plane-wave wavenumbers of the core and the cladding. Modes with <$\beta$> values close to the lower limit (the cladding wavenumber) have a small <$w$> parameter, leading to a slow decay of the radial function in the cladding.

One may calculate the effective refractive index of a fiber as its <$\beta$> value divided by the vacuum wavenumber. For guided modes, that effective index lies between the refractive indices of core and cladding.

The lowest-order mode (LP_{01}) has an intensity profile which is similar to that of a Gaussian beam, particularly in cases with not too high *V* number. Particularly for the higher <$m$> values, the resulting radial functions can oscillate in the fiber core, whereas it decays in the cladding. Figure 1 shows the radial functions for an example case. Here, we have two modes with <$\ell = 0$> (LP_{01}, LP_{02}) and one mode each for <$\ell = 1$> and <$\ell = 2$>. Note that for each non-zero <$\ell$> value we have two linearly independent solutions, having a <$\cos \ell \varphi$> and <$\sin \ell \varphi$> dependence, respectively, or alternatively a dependence on <$\exp(\pm i \ell \varphi )$>. Taking this into account, we have a total of 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 = 6 modes in our example case.

The higher the *V* number of the fiber, the more guided modes exist. For <$V$> below 2.405, there is only a single guided mode (apart from different polarization directions), so that we have a single-mode fiber. For large <$V$>, the number of modes is approximately to <$V^2 / 2$> (counting modes of both polarization directions). Figure 2 shows the complex amplitude profiles of all modes of a step-index fiber with a higher *V* number of 11.4.

The two colors indicate different signs of the electric field values. This diagram (as all others) has been produced with the software **RP Fiber Power**.

In this example, the LP_{23} and LP_{04} modes are relatively close to their cut-off: they would cease to exist for only a slightly longer wavelength. In such a case, the <$w$> parameter becomes quite small, so that the field penetrates more into the cladding. Such modes can be more sensitive to bend losses, for example. However, only for modes with <$\ell = 0$>, the power propagating in the core vanishes at the cut-off.

### Fibers with Other Refractive Index Profiles

For arbitrary radial index profiles, the guided modes can still be calculated as LP modes, even though their shapes may deviate substantially from those for a step-index fiber. One usually requires a numerical method for finding the radial solutions for guided modes, at least for the core part; a modified Bessel function can still be used for the cladding part, where the refractive index is constant. For the core part, one may always start at *r* = 0, propagate the field up to the core/cladding interface (using the Runge–Kutta algorithm, for example), and connect it with the modified Bessel function for the cladding part. The mismatch of the derivatives at the interface can be minimized by numerically refining the <$\beta$> value. One needs to implement a numerical strategy for finding all <$\beta$> values where that mismatch vanishes.

The numerical calculations are not entirely trivial due to various technical details. At least if a high computation speed is required, one has to carefully determine the required numerical step sizes depending on the parameters for each mode. The same applies to the parameters for numerical root finding.

Of course, the whole method cannot be applied anymore for not radially symmetric index profiles; one then has to refer to two-dimensional numerical methods, which are much more complicated to handle and require substantially more computation time.

Figure 2 shows the calculated mode functions for an example case.

### Propagation Velocity and Chromatic Dispersion

The phase velocity of a mode is simply the vacuum velocity of light divided by the effective refractive index (see above). The group velocity is the inverse of the derivative of the <$\beta$> value with respect to the angular frequency. For numerical calculations of the group velocity, one thus needs to calculate a mode for at least two different (closely spaced) wavelengths. In order to take into account the material dispersion, one needs to use wavelength-dependent refractive indices.

The group velocity dispersion is the second derivative of the <$\beta$> value with respect to the angular frequency. Numerically, one requires the <$\beta$> values for at least three different wavelengths. Note that for small wavelength spacings one requires a very high accuracy of the calculated <$\beta$> values.

### Orbital Angular Momentum

Mode functions based on an ansatz with <$\exp(\pm i \ell \varphi )$> (see above) are associated with an orbital angular momentum of <$\pm \ell \: h/2\pi$> per photon.

## Optimization of Refractive Index Profiles

By optimizing the refractive index profile of a fiber, one can improve a number of important parameters of the LP modes. For example, one may achieve the wanted mode sizes and number of modes, but also strongly modify the group velocity and chromatic dispersion. For minimizing mode coupling effects, one may take care that the <$\beta$> values of relevant modes do not get too close. Flexible software for calculating fiber modes can be an essential tool for such optimizations.

## More to Learn

- Tutorial on Passive Fiber Optics | single-mode, multimode fibers, polarization, chromatic dispersion, nonlinearities, Part 2: Fiber Modes | Core

- Case Study: Mode Structure of a Multimode Fiber
- Case Study: Telecom Fiber With Parabolic Index Profile

Encyclopedia articles:

### Bibliography

[1] | A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory, Chapman and Hall, London (1983) |

[2] | J. A. Buck, Fundamentals of Optical Fibers, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2004) |

[3] | F. Mitschke, Fiber Optics: Physics and Technology, Springer, Berlin (2010) |

[4] | R. Paschotta, Field Guide to Optical Fiber Technology, SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA (2010) |

## Questions and Comments from Users

2022-01-11

Do LP modes act like meridional or skew rays?

The author's answer:

Modes are not rays. Rays can in principle be regarded as complicated superpositions of modes, although that is not necessarily useful.

However, the point of interest in this context may be whether the light has substantial spatial overlap with the fiber core. The overlap of mode fields with the fiber core can be calculated. A substantial overlap is generally obtained for LP modes with <$l = 0$>, particularly for the fundamental mode LP_{01}. So in a way those LP modes behave more like meridional rays, while those with larger <$l$> are more like skew rays.

2022-06-16

How do we calculate the maximum value of <$m$> for each <$l$>?

The author's answer:

That generally requires numerical methods. As it is only a one-dimensional differential equation, it is not that difficult to solve. That solving has to be done for many <$\beta$> values, following a suitable strategy.

Here you can submit questions and comments. As far as they get accepted by the author, they will appear above this paragraph together with the author’s answer. The author will decide on acceptance based on certain criteria. Essentially, the issue must be of sufficiently broad interest.

Please do not enter personal data here. (See also our privacy declaration.) If you wish to receive personal feedback or consultancy from the author, please contact him, e.g. via e-mail.

By submitting the information, you give your consent to the potential publication of your inputs on our website according to our rules. (If you later retract your consent, we will delete those inputs.) As your inputs are first reviewed by the author, they may be published with some delay.

2021-02-24

By changing the 'l' value we can get different solutions from the Maxwell's equation. How could we change the value of 'm'? Where is the value of 'm' coming from?

The author's answer:

For a given <$\ell$> value, we obtain multiple solutions satisfying the boundary conditions, and the index <$m$> is simply used to enumerate those.