Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

Sponsors:     and others

Relative Intensity Noise

Acronym: RIN

Definition: noise of the optical intensity (or actually power), normalized to its average value

More general term: intensity noise

German: relatives Intensitätsrauschen

Categories: laser devices and laser physics, fluctuations and noise

How to cite the article; suggest additional literature


URL: https://www.rp-photonics.com/relative_intensity_noise.html

In the context of intensity noise (optical power fluctuations) of a laser, it is common to specify the relative intensity noise (RIN), which is the power noise normalized to the average power level. The optical power of the laser can be considered to be

power fluctuations

with an average value and a fluctuating quantity δP with zero mean value. The relative intensity is then δP divided by the average power; in the following, this quantity is called I. The relative intensity noise can be specified in different ways; a common way is to statistically describe it with a one-sided power spectral density (PSD):

power spectral density of relative intensity noise

which depends on the noise frequency f. It is essentially the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function of the normalized power fluctuations, and can be measured e.g. with a photodiode and an electronic spectrum analyzer.

The factor of 2 in the formula above applies to a one-sided PSD as usually used in the engineering disciplines, and would be missing in variants using two-sided PSDs. The units of the RIN PSD are Hz−1, but it is common to specify 10 times the logarithm (to base 10) of that quantity in dBc/Hz (see also: decibel). The PSD may also be integrated over an interval [f1, f2] of noise frequencies to obtain a root mean square (r.m.s.) value of relative intensity noise

r.m.s. value of relatively intensity noise

which is then often specified in percent.

Note that it is not sensible to specify relative intensity noise in percent (e.g. as ±0.5%) without clarifying whether this means an r.m.s. value or something else. See the article on noise specifications for more such details.

relative intensity noise spectrum of a laser
Figure 1: Simulated relative intensity noise spectrum of a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser with 100 mW average output power. The shot noise level of −174 dBc/Hz is reached above 5 MHz. There is also a pronounced peak from relaxation oscillations, and excess noise at low frequencies introduced by the pump source.

RIN from Shot Noise

It might be expected that the amount of RIN of a laser beam will remain constant when the beam is subject to linear attenuation. This is not true, however, when the RIN is limited by shot noise. In that case, the RIN is given by

shot-noise-limited relative intensity noise

As an example, a 1-mW laser beam at 1064 nm with intensity noise at the shot noise limit has a RIN of 3.73 × 10−16 Hz−1 or −154 dBc/Hz.

That PSD is independent of noise frequency (white noise), and it increases with decreasing average power. This can be understood as the introduction of additional quantum noise in the attenuation process.

Quantum-limited RIN measurements should be done by detecting the entire laser power e.g. with a photodiode, while minimizing the influence of excess noise (e.g. thermal noise) from the electronics. For high power levels, it can be challenging to find a sufficiently fast photodetector with high power handling capability, while electronic noise issues are more critical at low power levels.

Questions and Comments from Users


What is the difference between frequency noise and relative intensity noise?

Answer from the author:

Frequency noise is noise of the instantaneous frequency, which in optics means noise of the optical frequency. That is related to phase noise.


How to normalize the intensity fluctuations of a HeNe laser, measured with a photodiode?

Answer from the author:

This simply means that you divide the fluctuating power by the average power, obtaining a dimensionless quantity fluctuating around 1. You can then further process that, for example estimate the power spectral density.


How to convert RIN data with 1/sqrt(Hz) unit into a result with % units?

Answer from the author:

Multiply it with the square root of the detection bandwidth, and with 100 to get percent. The fluctuations of power will of course not fully remain within that percent value, but often go somewhat beyond it.


Is RIN the inverse of a signal to noise ratio (SNR)? In this case, the units of 1/RIN are Hz. What would that physically mean? You can multiply RIN by the bandwidth of the detector to get % fluctuation from the average signal. Is there any use for 1/RIN? Is that the bandwidth that gives 100% fluctuation?

Answer from the author:

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is a ratio, i.e., a dimensionless quantity, and can therefore not be identified with anything having units of Hz. It is usually used in the context of signals, and a continuous-wave laser beam would normally not be considered as a signal.

Further, note that RIN can be quantitatively specified in different ways, one of them being a power spectral density. That has units of 1/Hz, and you get a dimensionless quantity by multiplying it with a noise bandwidth. If you then consider the constant power as a “signal” (somewhat odd), you may identify that product with the inverse SNR.


How do I measure the reference DC voltage for the RIN Measurement? I have the following setup for the RIN measurement of a 50-MHz oscillator:

Laser → ND filter → lens → photodetector → 50 Ohm resistor → low pass filter (<10 MHz) → DC block → voltage amplifier → spectrum analyzer.

So for the DC measurement should I measure it after the photodetector directly with a 50 Ohm termination or should I measure it after the voltage amplifier (with DC Block removed from the setup) and divide the final DC voltage with the amplification factor of the voltage amplifier?

Answer from the author:

It is often not so easy to measure the corresponding DC part, because you usually cannot feed that through the high-gain amplifier. Indeed, one possibility would be to measure the DC voltage drop at a resistor.

Another way of getting the RIN calibrated relative to the short noise level is to use a homodyne detection measurement setup, containing a 50:50 beam splitter two photodiodes with high quantum efficiency, and circuits to get the sum and the differences of the photocurrents. The sum current gives you the actual noise (when a correction according to the finite quantum efficiency is applied), while the difference current gives you the shot noise level.


To calculate the RIN from shot noise: let us assume that we have to reduce the power of the laser beam via a neutral density filter to avoid saturation of the detector. For the light power P, do I need to enter the actual power of the laser source (e.g. 200 mW) or the power after passing through the filter (e.g. 1 mW)? The latter would correspond to the actual power that hits the detector.

Answer from the author:

The latter is correct – the power which actually hits the detector. Attenuation leads to higher RIN from shot noise.

Here you can submit questions and comments. As far as they get accepted by the author, they will appear above this paragraph together with the author’s answer. The author will decide on acceptance based on certain criteria. Essentially, the issue must be of sufficiently broad interest.

Please do not enter personal data here; we would otherwise delete it soon. (See also our privacy declaration.) If you wish to receive personal feedback or consultancy from the author, please contact him e.g. via e-mail.

Your question or comment:

Spam check:

  (Please enter the sum of thirteen and three in the form of digits!)

By submitting the information, you give your consent to the potential publication of your inputs on our website according to our rules. (If you later retract your consent, we will delete those inputs.) As your inputs are first reviewed by the author, they may be published with some delay.

See also: intensity noise, noise specifications, quantum noise
and other articles in the categories laser devices and laser physics, fluctuations and noise


Share this with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

These sharing buttons are implemented in a privacy-friendly way!