Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

Sponsorship opportunity: support this popular resource, which serves the whole photonics community, and get recognition!

Sech2-shaped Pulses

Definition: pulses with a temporal intensity profile which has the shape of a sech2 function

German: sech2-förmige Pulse

Category: light pulses

How to cite the article; suggest additional literature


Ultrashort pulses from mode-locked lasers often have a temporal shape (i.e., shape of the curve showing optical power versus time) which can be described with a squared hyperbolic secant (sech) function:

intensity profile of sech-shaped pulse

The full width at half-maximum pulse duration is approximately 1.76 times the parameter τ. (That parameter itself is sometimes called the pulse duration.)

In many practical cases (e.g. soliton mode locking), sech2 pulses have hardly any chirp, i.e., they are close to transform-limited. The time–bandwidth product is then ≈ 0.315.

Compared with a Gaussian function with the same half-width, the sech2 function has stronger wings, as shown in Figure 1.

comparison of sech-shaped and Gaussian pulses
Figure 1: Temporal shapes of sech2 and Gaussian pulses.

The peak power of a sech2 pulse is ≈ 0.88 times the pulse energy divided by the FWHM pulse duration.

The sech2 shape is typical of fundamental soliton pulses (in the absence of higher-order dispersion and self-steepening). Therefore, this pulse shape also occurs in soliton mode-locked lasers. However, it is also found in other situations; for example, passive mode locking with a slow absorber usually leads to a pulse shape which is relatively close to the sech2 shape.

See also: pulses, Gaussian pulses, solitons, soliton mode locking, transform limit
and other articles in the category light pulses

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media: