How to Calculate Misalignment Effects In Laser Resonators
Resonator designs are often analyzed under the assumption that the resonator will be perfectly aligned. However, it is often important to analyze misalignment effects as well – particularly when developing commercial products.
The most important type of misalignment is a deviation of the angular orientation of a mirror from its nominal position. That can easily result not only from actively turning a screw at a mirror holder, but also due to thermal effects. Particularly for lasers with relatively large mode areas, tiny angular misalignments can lead to substantial effects. Essentially, the resonator modes will move away from their normal position such that they again hit the end mirrors in an exactly perpendicular fashion. (I am always assuming a linear resonator here, which is most common.) Even if the modes stay far enough away from the edges of all mirrors, so that diffraction losses at those edges are avoided, the problem is usually that the overlap between pump beam and laser beam in the laser crystal is reduced. That will then not only reduce the output power, but often also degrades the beam quality.
Interestingly, the alignment sensitivity of a laser resonator can sensitively depend on various parameters, and it can vary strongly e.g. when the operation point is changed via the thermal lens of the laser crystal. Typically, a linear resonator has two stability zones, and the alignment sensitivity can be very different in those two; there is even a divergence of alignment sensitivity at one of the four stability edges, and it is certainly not advisable to operate a laser near to such a point.
You see that the alignment sensitivity really depends on the design, not just on a few basic parameters like resonator length and mode size.
For simple resonators, it is not too difficult to calculate the resulting shift of the beam position based on simple geometric considerations. However, that will soon become rather inconvenient e.g. if one has several curved mirrors and/or thermal lensing in the laser crystal. The natural solution is that the software used for the resonator design calculates not only beam radii, but also such misalignment effects. In the following, I briefly explain how that works.
For beam radius calculations only, one usually uses so-called ABCD matrices. These have originally been designed for purely geometric considerations in ray optics, and later found to be very useful for wave optics as well: such a matrix cannot only be applied to geometric vectors, but also used for propagating the so-called complex <$q$> parameter of a Gaussian beam which carries the information on beam radius and wavefront curvature of such a beam.
This is not enough for misalignment calculations, however. For that purpose, the method had to be extended: one can use a so-called ABCDEF matrices (O. E. Martínez, “Matrix formalism for dispersive laser cavities”, J. Quantum Electron. 25 (3), 296 (1989)), containing two additional parameters E and F related to the misalignment apart from a few constant components. One can apply such 3×3 matrices to geometric 3-component vectors containing beam offset, beam angle and a “1” as third component in order to propagate the misalignment through a whole resonator. Further, one can then calculate an eigenvector which is reproduced after one resonator round trip; this gives the mode position under the condition of misalignments.
I just tell you that the technical details are very complicated. I remember having spent many hours with very sophisticated work, partly due to the mistakes in the equations in the above-mentioned paper. When this finally worked, I used it for only one published paper (J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17 (4), 646 (2000), DOI:10.1364/JOSAB.17.000646). However, the software nevertheless became very useful later on – not for the original purpose, but for general resonator design issues. It finally evolved into the software RP Resonator, for which RP Photonics is now selling user licenses.
Wavelength-dependent Beam Positions
The described method can also be applied to effects of wavelength-dependent refraction. Consider, for example, a prism pair for dispersion compensation in a mode-locked laser. Here, each wavelength component of the circulating ultrashort pulse has a slightly different beam position in part of the resonator, and the resulting wavelength-dependent path length produces chromatic dispersion. For simple prism pairs, one can use certain formulas for calculating the resulting dispersion, but it is nice if the software can calculate such effects for arbitrary resonators. One can, for example, then also take into account refraction effects at Brewster interfaces.
No Problem with the Right Software
When you have the software RP Resonator, calculating misalignment effects becomes quite easy. It just requires two things:
- For those resonator mirrors which are misaligned, specify the angular error with the additional parameter
delta_tfor the tangential direction or
delta_sfor the sagittal direction.
- Use the functions
d_s()e.g. to plot the tangential and sagittal beam offset from the nominal beam position as a function of the <$z$> position. (There are also functions
da_s()for the angular offsets.)
Below you see an example of such a plot (see the dashed black curve) for a typical laser resonator. The alignment sensitivity diverges at the left stability edge, and is much smaller in the right stability zone. In practice, you would find that the resonator is very hard to align for low pump powers. In other cases, it is the other way round, e.g. with diverging alignment sensitivity as the pump power increases. Obviously, you want to know that before you decide to build a resonator!
You can use such functions not only for plots. For example, for the numerical optimization of the resonator design you can define a figure-of-merit function containing the alignment sensitivity. Essentially, you can tell the software that you don't like deviations of mode radii from certain values, but you also don't like the sensitivity of the beam position particularly in the laser crystal, resulting from misalignment. That way, you can often find resonator designs with a substantially lower alignment sensitivity.
Questions and Comments from Users
Here you can submit questions and comments. As far as they get accepted by the author, they will appear above this paragraph together with the author’s answer. The author will decide on acceptance based on certain criteria. Essentially, the issue must be of sufficiently broad interest.
Please do not enter personal data here; we would otherwise delete it soon. (See also our privacy declaration.) If you wish to receive personal feedback or consultancy from the author, please contact him, e.g. via e-mail.
By submitting the information, you give your consent to the potential publication of your inputs on our website according to our rules. (If you later retract your consent, we will delete those inputs.) As your inputs are first reviewed by the author, they may be published with some delay.