RP Photonics logo
RP Photonics
Technical consulting services on lasers, nonlinear optics, fiber optics etc.
Profit from the knowledge and experience of a top expert!
Powerful simulation and design software.
Make computer models in order to get a comprehensive understanding of your devices!
Success comes from understanding – be it in science or in industrial development.
The famous Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology – available online for free!
The ideal place for finding suppliers for many photonics products.
Advertisers: Make sure to have your products displayed here!
… combined with a great Buyer's Guide!
VLib part of the

The Photonics Spotlight

The Photonics Spotlight – associated with the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology – is a “blog” (web log) with the purpose of highlighting interesting news and useful information in the area of photonics, particularly laser technology and applications. The content can be related to particularly interesting scientific papers or to other forms of publications, reporting for example cute new techniques, special achievements, or useful hints.

Note that the Spotlight articles (as well as those of the Encyclopedia) are citable. Permanent links are given for each article.

This blog is operated by of RP Photonics Consulting. Comments and suggestions are welcome. The news items are definitely not available for advertising, but advertisers can order banners on the right column of this page.

You can read this content in various ways:

If you like this resource, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

And here are the articles:

Gain Saturation with Pulses

It is well-known that the saturation of the optical gain of a laser amplifier operated with constant pump and signal input power can be described with a formula like g(Ps) = g0 / (1 + Ps / Psat), where g0 is the small-signal gain, Ps is the signal input power and Psat is the saturation power. (The gain should be small, as otherwise the signal power rises within the gain medium; otherwise, one may have to numerically split the gain medium into several sections.) What, however, happens when we apply a short signal pulse? That question is relevant in many important cases, for example involving pulsed amplifiers and Q-switched lasers.

Calculating Gain Saturation

Some people believe that saturation of a laser amplifier becomes substantial once the power of a signal pulse approximately reaches the level of the saturation power. That guess can be quite wrong, however. The formula given above applies only in the steady state, and that is typically reached after a few times the upper-state lifetime of the laser medium. For most solid-state laser gain media, the upper-state lifetime is well above 1 μs, so that a nanosecond or even picosecond pulse is by far not long enough to bring the gain medium to its steady state.

For pulse durations far below the upper-state lifetime, it is quite clear that spontaneous emission has a negligible impact on the upper state population during the time of such a pulse. Therefore, the value of the upper-state lifetime cannot be relevant for the saturation behavior, and the same holds for the saturation power, which depends on the upper-state lifetime. What is relevant here is the saturation energy Esat, which is essentially determined by the emission cross section at the signal wavelength and is not influenced by the upper-state lifetime. (For example, it is not affected by quenching processes reducing that lifetime.) Again, a simple formula can be used to calculate the gain after the pulse: gf = gi exp(−Es / Esat), where gi is the initial gain and Es is the signal pulse energy.

Example: Saturation in a Q-switched Laser

When the resonator of a Q-switched solid-state laser is switched to its high-Q state, the signal power rises rapidly, starting from a very low level. When it reaches the saturation power, gain saturation still stays very weak, as explained above. Only once the temporally integrated laser power reaches the order of the saturation energy, gain saturation sets in. Therefore, the peak power occurring within such a laser (and also the output peak power) can be orders of magnitude above the saturation power of the gain medium. (For a continuous-wave output power, that is usually impossible.)

Gain Saturation Caused by an Ultrashort Pulse

A difficult issue arises when we want to calculate the saturation of a laser gain medium in an ultrafast amplifier caused by an optical pulse with a duration far below 1 ps. Such a pulse has a substantial optical bandwidth – at least the Fourier-limited bandwidth or even more in case of chirped pulses. One would naturally describe the spectral properties in the frequency domain, but that is clearly unsuitable for calculating the time-dependent gain. Obviously, neither the time domain nor the frequency domain is suitable for fully treating what happens here.

The interaction of single atoms or ions with pulsed light can be described with Bloch equations, which are differential equations in the time domain. For a complicated ensemble of laser-active ions interacting with a host crystal, however, this approach is hardly applicable. The first challenge which one meets here is that one will normally not get all the detailed data to describe the behavior of ions in such a situation.

How can one obtain at least approximate results? As long as the pulse energy is well below the saturation energy, one can easily calculate the pulse amplification in the frequency domain. The weak effect of gain saturation can be simulated afterwords by reducing the gain according to the amount of energy the pulse has extracted – which is simply the difference of output and input pulse energy, assuming that additional effects such as parasitic losses do not occur.

For the case that the pulse energy reaches or exceeds the level of the saturation energy, the described approach can be extended. One may simulate the interaction of the pulse with the gain medium in multiple steps, where each time only a fraction of the gain is applied to the pulse, and afterwords the gain is reduced according to the extracted energy. This is an approximate method, however, which cannot precisely describe the details of such an amplification process.

Self-phase Modulation Causes Spectral Broadening – Does it Really?

For many, it seems to be common wisdom that the effect of self-phase modulation (SPM), which results from the Kerr nonlinearity, always increases the optical bandwidth of an ultrashort pulse. After all, it creates a so-called chirp, i.e., a temporal variation of the instantaneous frequency, which then runs through a wider range of frequencies. This effect is utilized, for example, in a method of temporal pulse compression, where one first broadens the bandwidth using SPM and then temporally compresses the pulse by applying an appropriate amount of chromatic dispersion which removes the created chirp.

However, it should then be irritating that various example cases quite clearly contradict the mentioned belief:

All this can be resolved by considering more carefully the generation of additional frequency components by the Kerr nonlinearity. The essential point is to realize that the Kerr nonlinearity adds certain complex amplitudes to other frequency components. (The typically used differential equations for light propagation in fibers clearly show that.) How the intensities of these frequency components change, depends on the relative signs of existing and added complex amplitudes:

We see that the sign of the chirp of the pulse is essential for the nonlinear effects on the pulse spectrum, as is also illustrated in the following two diagrams:

SPM on up-chirped pulse

Figure 1: Evolution of the spectrum of an initially up-chirped pulse under the influence of SPM. (Subsequent spectra are more and more vertically displaced.) The pulse spectrum is increasingly broadened.

SPM on down-chirped pulse

Figure 2: Evolution of the spectrum of an initially down-chirped pulse under the influence of SPM. The pulse spectrum is initially compressed.

It is also instructive to consider a soliton mode-locked laser where the pulse bandwidth is constantly reduced by the finite gain bandwidth (→ gain narrowing). In the steady state of the laser, there must be an effect to compensate for this. Apart from a modulator or a saturable absorber, SPM can take over that function. The pulse then must develop a positive chirp, as spectral broadening is possible only with that. Indeed one can observe in computer simulations that pulses in soliton mode-locked lasers exhibit a slight up-chirp, depending on the magnitude of bandwidth-reducing effects.

The presented thoughts demonstrate that one can learn a lot by thinking about basic effects e.g. in ultrafast optics or laser physics a little more closely. Many people are too quickly satisfied with inaccurate descriptions of effects, which are in contradiction even with quite common observations.

The probably most effective way for detecting and subsequently revising inaccurate beliefs is to deal with numerical models. Here, existing beliefs are continuously put to test. Seeing quite easily what exactly goes on in various systems (e.g., in a transparent laser realized in the form of a computer model), one quite quickly realizes that certain thoughts cannot be correct. At the same time, this is one of the greatest opportunities to obtain new ideas.

Alignment Sensitivity of Laser Resonators – an Important Design Criterion

Ref.: encyclopedia articles on optical resonators, alignment sensitivity, resonator design

Everyone in the field knows that an essential design criterion for laser resonators is to have appropriate mode radii, particularly within a laser crystal. For example, the mode radius in the laser crystal should approximately match the mode radius of the pump beam if one wants to achieve transverse single-mode operation, which results in a high beam quality.

What is much less known is the importance of the alignment sensitivity of laser resonators, and that it can be greatly influenced by the resonator design. The easy part is to understand why a low alignment sensitivity is very desirable; obviously, you do not want a resonator which needs to be aligned with extreme care, and it needs to be realigned when ever some optomechanical parts (e.g. mirror holders) are slightly affected e.g. by thermal expansion, or when the thermal lens is modified by changes of the pump beam profile. Particularly for an industrial product, an excessive alignment sensitivity cannot be tolerated.

In extreme cases, one would not even achieve any reasonable performance, even when working hard on a fine alignment, if thermal effects in the laser crystal are strong. Interestingly, the alignment affects the power and position of the circulating laser beam, which can also lead to modifications of thermal lensing, and that again affects the beam position and power; if such mutual influences are strong enough, you can get a very strange behavior of the laser which prevents any reasonable performance.

Calculating Alignment Sensitivities and Applying that Knowledge

Experts in the field of laser resonator design know very well that the alignment sensitivity of a laser resonator, e.g. concerning angular positions of laser mirrors, can be calculated with suitable software, which does not use a simple ABCD matrix algorithm but rather an extended algorithm using 3×3 matrices. The alignment sensitivity can then be used as a criterion for the quality of the laser design; it can (and often should) even be included in a figure of merit within an automatic optimization procedure. Ignoring this important aspect in laser design can easily lead to designs with unnecessarily high alignment sensitivity which do not work well in practice.

Mode Areas are Important – What Else?

It is also known that lasers with large mode areas tend to have a higher alignment sensitivity. (This is the essential reason why high-power lasers are often much more delicate to align; the wide-spread believe that this results simply from the large size of the resonator itself is wrong, as discussed in an earlier posting.) However, there is no fixed relation between mode size and alignment sensitivity; one can have two different laser resonator designs with the same mode area in the laser crystal which differ very much (e.g. by a factor larger than 5) concerning alignment sensitivity. In case of linear resonators (standing-wave resonators), one has two different stability zones in terms of the focusing power of the thermal lens, and these can have very different alignment sensitivities. Unfortunately, one cannot always use the less sensitive zone, because that involves limitations in other aspects.

The issue of alignment sensitivities even at the heart of an often encountered trade-off: high-power laser can often be designed either for a high power conversion efficiency and robustness or for highest beam quality, but not both at the same time. Obviously, one can hardly find optimized designs without understanding these issues very well.

How to Find a Suitable Resonator Design?

Even in seemingly simple cases, it is very desirable that the person developing a laser resonator design understands the matter well. The required knowledge goes far beyond a basic understanding of resonator modes; it should definitely include a precise knowledge on alignment sensitivity issues and substantial experience concerning various typical trade-offs. Simply having a heavy textbook in the office, or even having read it, will often not be sufficient.

A suitable laser resonator design software (such as our product RP Resonator) must definitely be able to calculate alignment sensitivities and to take them into account in optimizations. However, no software in this area can replace a decent technical understanding of the person using it; I think it is not possible to make it such that it takes into account all important issues without bothering the user with it. For example, a software can hardly “know” the importance of various resonator properties for the particular application, i.e., it could not put appropriate weights on certain factors in the trade-offs which are necessary. At least, however, software from a good source comes with very helpful technical support, giving you crucial pieces of advice.

If you need a proper laser resonator design, you basically have two different options:

  • You can try to acquire all the required expertise (which is certainly not easy and will require substantial time) and also get a good resonator design software.
  • You can try to find an experienced expert who can do that job for you. That person would first closely analyze the concrete requirements in a dialogue with you, then translate that into appropriate resonator properties such as mode sizes and maximum alignment sensitivities, and finally work out a suitable design using proper design software.

If you quite often need resonator designs, it will probably try to get into the position of doing it yourself. If that is not the case, however, it will often be much more economical (and also lead to better results) to have an external expert doing it.

In any case, I warmly recommend to take the question of resonator design very serious, because this very much contributes to an efficient product development, avoiding a lot of possible problems causing delays and cost overruns.

By the way, the fact that a very simple resonator has been used so far for certain lasers does in no way prove that more elaborate laser design considerations would be wasting resources. After all, how can you know that the simple type of resonator is doing its job well and could not be improved? Also, even seemingly simple resonators are not so easy to understand. Finally, a few hours of good work by a competent expert cost far less than what you might well pay for wrong decisions on such matters.

Older Postings

2015-04-10: The Enormous Popularity of the RP Photonics Website

2015-03-11: Strange Time Dependence of ASE from a Fiber Amplifier

2015-02-05: Attenuating Laser Beams – not That Easy

2015-01-09: New Tutorial: Modeling of Fiber Amplifiers and Lasers

2014-12-17: How PhD Students Should Get Supported by Supervisors

2014-11-14: Correctly Designing Frequency Conversion Stages: Not Easy, but Worthwhile!

2014-10-03: Fiber Optics Tutorials

2014-07-28: How to Define the Mode Radius of a Fiber?

2014-06-27: Shortages of Rare Earth Materials – a Problem for Photonics?

2014-05-16: 10-Year Anniversary of RP Photonics

2014-04-02: Lower Emission Cross-section Leads to Higher Pulse Energy?!?

2014-01-17: Mediation in Disputes on Laser Technology

2013-12-13: Avoiding Trouble with Laser Specifications

2013-11-12: Beam Quality Limit for Multimode Fibers

2013-09-24: Simulation of a Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser:
Numerical Beam Propagation Reveals What Happens, Analytical Reasoning Explains It

2013-08-26: Frequency Doubling and the Reverse Process

2013-07-08: Amplified Spontaneous Emission in Fiber Amplifiers

2013-06-13: Two New Photonics Newsletters

2012-08-06: The New RP Photonics Buyer's Guide

2012-03-12: New Raman Lasers

2012-03-03: Conflicting Definitions of s and p Polarization

2012-02-03: Simulation Software: Use Commercial Products or Home-Made Software?

2011-12-23: Kerr-lens Mode-locked Thin-disk Laser

2011-06-10: Are Compact Resonators More Stable?

2011-05-28: Explanation for the Mode Instability in High-power Fiber Amplifiers with Few-mode Fibers

2011-03-13: What if Solid-State Laser Transitions Would Be Much Stronger?

2011-02-10: Fiber Lasers: More Difficult to Design than Bulk Lasers

2011-01-05: Femtosecond Fiber Amplifiers: Unlimited Peak Power?

2010-09-02: Why LEDs are Energy-efficient, and Why They Could Well Increase Energy Consumption

2010-07-27: Special SESAMs for Mode-locked High-power Lasers?

2010-07-12: Laser Development: Get an Expert Early on!

2010-06-09: Poor Man's Isolator

2010-05-14: Plagiarism, Exploiting the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2010-04-26: Resolution and Accuracy of Measurements

2010-04-16: Why Large Mode Area Waveguides Do Not Work for Laser Diodes

2010-04-08: Creating a Top-hat Laser Beam Focus

2010-03-22: All-in-one Concepts versus Modular Concepts

2010-03-15: Spatial Walk-off and Beam Quality in Nonlinear Frequency Conversion

2010-03-09: Nonlinearities in Fiber Amplifier Modeling

2010-03-03: Thresholds for Nonlinear Effects in Fiber Amplifiers

2010-02-26: New Scientific Paper: Timing Jitter and Phase Noise of Mode-locked Fiber Lasers

2010-02-06: Scientific Conferences and Publications: Emphasize Device Performance or Insight?

2010-01-29: Far From Maturity: The Photonics Industry

2010-01-22: Pumping Fiber Lasers with Fiber Lasers

2010-01-11: Beams of Laser Pointers: Visible in Air?

2009-12-31: Tilt Tuning of Etalons

2009-12-13: Johnson–Nyquist Noise in Photodiode Circuits

2009-12-08: Increased Output Power of a Laser with Forced Tuning

2009-11-22: The Beam Focus – Not Just a Demagnified Version of Your Beam

2009-11-18: Articles and a Quiz on Photonics Issues

2009-11-13: Photodetection: Optical and Electrical Powers

2009-11-03: Coherent Light from a Bulb?

2009-10-19: Risk Factors for Science Fraud and the Scientist's Responsibility

2009-10-12: Cold Light from the Hottest Bodies and from Cool Devices

2009-10-08: Nobel Prize for Charles K. Kao for Pioneering Work on Optical Fibers

2009-10-03: Peak Intensity of Gaussian Beam

2009-09-27: Lasers with Short Upper-state Lifetime

2009-09-19: Are Laser Resonators Power Scalable?

2009-09-07: Anniversary: 5 Years of the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2009-09-01: Fresnel Reflections from Double Interfaces

2009-08-22: Jitter and Phase Noise of Mode-locked Fiber Lasers

2009-08-14: Progress on Green Laser Diodes

2009-08-12: What is an Optical Transistor?

2009-07-29: No Beat Note for Orthogonal Modes

2009-07-23: Submit Photographs for the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2009-07-21: Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Measurement Bandwidth

2009-07-09: Gain-guiding Index-antiguiding Fibers

2009-06-29: Doing Things Properly: It's the Economy, Stupid!

2009-06-23: Coherence – a Black-or-White Issue?

2009-06-08: Prizes of the European Physical Society

2009-06-02: 5 Years of RP Photonics Consulting

2009-05-22: Interference Effects with Imbalanced Intensity Levels

2009-05-13: The Minimum Time–Bandwidth Product

2009-04-28: SPIE Field Guides

2009-04-19: Last Chance to Get the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology Cheaper

2009-04-17: Miniature Laser Projectors – The Next Big Laser Thing?

2009-04-06: Laser Pointers in Soccer Games: Not Necessarily Harmless

2009-04-05: Stability of Resonators – an Ambiguous Term

2009-03-19: Scientific Progress: not as Straight a Process as it Seems

2009-03-07: Complicated Pulse Shapes from Q-switched Fiber Lasers

2009-03-02: User Interfaces for Simulation Software

2009-02-13: Laser Beam Deflections: The Angle–Diameter Product

2009-01-12: Chaotic Lasing Generates Random Numbers

2009-01-05: Extremely Long Mode-locked Fiber Laser

2008-12-16: Why Fiber Amplifiers, not Fiber Lasers?

2008-11-25: The Gouy Phase Shift Speeds up Light

2008-11-08: Validating Numerical Simulation Software

2008-10-20: Rate Equations – An Example for Stiff Sets of Differential Equations

2008-10-03: Wavelength-Tunable Lasers: Does the Tuner Degrade the Power Efficiency?

2008-09-24: Decoupling Pulse Duration and Pulse Energy

2008-09-10: Unpolarized Single-Frequency Output

2008-08-28: Photographs for the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2008-08-15: Print Version of the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2008-07-26: Beat Signals with Zero Linewidth

2008-07-13: The Simplified History of the Michelson–Morley Experiment

2008-07-02: Stronger Focusing Avoids SESAM Damage

2008-06-20: All-in-One Ultrafast Laser Systems

2008-06-13: Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and the Transform Limit

2008-06-06: Fiber Lasers Which Are No Fiber Lasers

2008-05-25: Einstein and the Laser

2008-05-13: Easier Self-Starting Passive Mode Locking for Short Lasers

2008-05-05: Length of a Photon

2008-04-28: Different Kinds of Polarization

2008-04-22: Abused Photonics Terms: Coherence

2008-04-15: Abused Photonics Terms: Modes

2008-04-02: Solitons: Lower Dispersion, Stronger Dispersive Effects!

2008-03-26: Mode-Locked Lasers: Lower Average Powers in Shorter Pulses

2008-03-17: Ultrafast Fiber Lasers: Re-Inventing Mode Locking

2008-03-10: Automatic Phase Matching

2008-03-04: What is a “High” Laser Beam Quality?

2008-02-22: Launching Light from a Bulb into a Single-Mode Fiber

2008-02-14: How Laser Development Can Go Wrong

2008-02-12: Factor 2 in the Equation for Cross-Phase Modulation

2008-02-03: Quantifying the Chirp of Ultrashort Pulses

2008-01-27: Beam Quality in Second-Harmonic Generation

2008-01-14: Frequency Doubling: Long Pulses Cause Trouble

2008-01-06: Saturation Intensity or Saturation Fluence of a Saturable Absorber or a Laser Gain Medium: What Matters?

2007-12-18: The Role of Laser Safety Goggles

2007-12-11: The Idler Wave - Essential for Parametric Amplification and Oscillation

2007-12-03: New Paper on Power Scaling of Lasers

2007-11-26: Solving Laser Problems Step by Step

2007-11-19: Walk-Off and Phase-Matching Bandwidth in Nonlinear Crystals

2007-11-10: Retirement of Prof. David C. Hanna

2007-11-02: Ultrafast Laser Kills Viruses

2007-10-31: Thermal Equilibrium in Laser Crystals

2007-10-25: The Gain Bandwidth of Laser Crystals and Glasses

2007-10-17: Why the Second-Harmonic Beam is Smaller

2007-10-11: Understanding Fourier Spectra

2007-10-07: Effective Refractive Index: Correcting a Common Belief

2007-09-27: Light Plus Light = Darkness: No Energy Problem, but Quantum Weirdness

2007-09-21: Optimum Crystal Length for Frequency Doubling

2007-09-13: Using Figures of the Encyclopedia in Your Publications, and Citing the Encyclopedia

2007-09-07: Power Scaling in Downward Direction

2007-09-01: Stimulated Brillouin Scattering: Lower Peak Power, Stronger Effect?

2007-08-27: Distant Healing of Lasers

2007-08-23: An OPO Without Resonator Mirrors

2007-08-22: Saturation of Pump Absorption - An Important Issue?

2007-08-15: Light = Electromagnetic Waves?

2007-08-06: Fiber Amplifiers: More ASE for Larger Core with Higher NA?

2007-07-30: Fiber Amplifiers: Stronger ASE in Backward Direction

2007-07-25: Higher Heat Generation Density, Stronger Thermal Effects?

2007-07-16: Mode Competition - Increased or Decreased by Spatial Hole Burning?

2007-07-11: What is a Beam Width, Beam Size, and a Beam Waist?

2007-07-06: Promoting Dangerous Practices in Laser Labs

2007-07-01: Nonsensical Regulations Undermine Laser Safety

2007-06-24: The Plague of a Narrow Emission Linewidth

2007-06-11: Beam Quality Measurements Can Easily Go Wrong

2007-06-01: Characterize Your Pump Beam!

2007-05-26: Optical Isotropy: Nonlinear Interactions are Different!

2007-05-19: Why Strong Birefringence in Fibers Helps

2007-05-10: Fundamental Limitation for sigma-tau Product, Gain Efficiency, and Laser Threshold

2007-04-28: Easier Launching into Fibers with Large Mode Area?

2007-04-16: Questions and Answers on Shot Noise

2007-04-01: The Ideal Pump Intensity Distribution in an End-Pumped Solid-State Laser

2007-03-23: Explaining the Nature of Photons to Lay Persons

2007-03-16: Time To Market and the Economics of Laser Development - or How to Cause Great Financial Damage without Spending Money

2007-03-11: Divided-Pulse Amplification

2007-03-09: The Trouble with Crystal and Coating Damage

2007-03-05: More Efficient Frequency Doubling with Shorter Pulses?

2007-02-26: No Laser, no Result?

2007-02-22: Lossy Laser Cavities

2007-02-16: The Science of Biophotons

2007-02-09: Papers Reporting Yet Another Laser Crystal

2007-02-04: Continuing Struggle for Larger Fiber Mode Areas

2007-01-27: Noise Figure of Amplifiers

2007-01-21: Operation Far Above Threshold

2007-01-15: Origins of Heating in Laser Crystals

2007-01-09: The Myth of Fiber-Optic Polar Bears

2007-01-05: Why the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology is Successful

2006-12-31: Peak Position of an Optical Spectrum

2006-12-16: Dangerous Green Laser Pointers

2006-12-09: The Laser Industry - High Tech or Low Tech?

2006-12-03: Diffraction in Optical Fibers

2006-11-28: The Role of Diffraction in Optical Resonators

2006-11-21: The Resonator Mystery

2006-11-16: Laser Models - not Always Useful

2006-11-04: Nd:YVO4 Laser with Polarization-Independent Pump Absorption

2006-11-02: Reflection Spectrum of Tilted Dielectric Mirrors

2006-10-26: Residual Transmission Through Highly Reflecting Mirrors

2006-10-22: Lasers Attract Dust to Cavity Mirrors

2006-10-17: A Cute New Imaging Technique Named Compressive Imaging

2006-10-16: Using a Current Amplifier for Optical Power Measurements and Recording with a Photodiode

2006-10-15: Fivehundred Articles in the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology

2006-10-09: Correct Specifications for Laser Noise - Valuable but Hard to Obtain

2006-10-04: Higher-Order Modes of Fibers: a Solution for Single-Mode Guidance with Large Mode Area?

2006-10-01: Stability Zones of Laser Resonators

2006-09-29: Frequency Dependence of the Conversion Efficiency for Frequency Doubling

2006-09-22: Coherence Length of Ultrashort Pulses

2006-09-21: Power Scaling Limits of Optical Parametric Amplifiers

2006-09-16: Q-switched Lasers: YAG versus Vanadate

2006-09-06: Quenching Degrades the Efficiency of Some Ytterbium-Doped Gain Media

2006-09-03: Single-Frequency Operation Stabilized by Spatial Hole Burning

2006-09-03: Resolution of Conundrum: Threshold Power for Parametric Nonlinear Interactions

2006-09-01: Test Yourself with the Photonics Quiz

2006-08-23: Lasers with Nonlinear Input-Output Characteristics

2006-08-20: Lower Noise from Longer Lasers

2006-08-18: Resolution of Conundrum: No Magnetic Field on the Axis of a Coil

2006-08-15: The Effect of a Double Pass in a Frequency Doubler

2006-08-12: Understanding Quasi-Three-Level Lasers

2006-08-10: Single-Mode Fibers with Large Mode Areas

2006-08-01: Lasers Disturbed by Vacuum?

2006-07-30: Threshold Power for Parametric Nonlinear Interactions

2006-07-24: Beam Distortions in Laser Cavities

2006-07-23: Single-Atom Lasers

2006-07-22: No Magnetic Field on the Axis of a Coil?

2006-07-21: Photonics and Laser Technology Blogs – Where Are They?

2006-07-16: Spontaneous Emission and Amplifier Noise

2006-07-14: Lasers Like it Cool

2006-07-10: Strength of Thermal Lensing Effects

2006-07-05: Laser Design: Side Product or the Basis of Laser Development?

2006-07-01: Lifting the Confusion Concerning Doping Concentrations

2006-07-01: Characterizing a Cavity with a Frequency Comb

2006-07-01: With Wavelength Combs to Picometer Resolution


… and keep in mind that the competent technical consulting services of RP Photonics could be very useful for your business!

© RP Photonics Consulting GmbH contact and legal info
ASSL 2015

– Show all banners –

– Get your own banner! –