RP Photonics

Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

VLib
Virtual
Library

The Photonics Spotlight

Lifting the Confusion Concerning Doping Concentrations

Posted on 2006-07-01 (revised on 2006-07-02) as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)

Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2006_07_01c.html

Author: Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Abstract: Unclear specifications of doping concentrations in laser crystals and glass fibers cause a lot of confusion. RP Photonics clarifies some issues.

Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

Ref.: encyclopedia article on doping concentration

There are quite a few different ways to specify doping concentrations in laser crystals and glass fibers. Unfortunately, it is very often not made clear which definition is actually used. As a consequence, doping concentrations are quite commonly seen as a kind of house numbers: the crystal with the higher percentage of doping is expected to absorb the pump radiation better (hoping that both specifications were based on the same definition).

Knowing what these numbers really mean allows one to do useful calculations. For example, one may predict the pump absorption efficiency before one builds up a laser. Quite obviously, this can be more efficient than a “trial and error” approach of ordering different crystals and taking those which work best.

To clarify the situation, RP Photonics has recently published a new encyclopedia article on the issue of doping concentrations.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the RP Photonics Encyclopedia.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Comments:

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

arrow