Posted on 2006-07-23 as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)
Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2006_07_23.html
Abstract: Judged in terms of wall-plug efficiency or dollars per watt, the single-atom laser as demonstrated in Pasadena is a total failure. However, the corresponding studies can generate a lot of interesting insight.
Ref.: encyclopedia article on single-atom lasers
I hope that Jeff Kimble, the famous quantum optics guru at Caltech, will forgive me for judging the single-atom laser demonstrated by his research group as a total failure in terms of wall-plug efficiency and particularly concerning the dollars per watt. I do appreciate that despite these shortcomings the single-atom laser has its definite merits. It is an interesting system, differing from the usual types of lasers in several quite fundamental respects, and exhibiting properties which can be explained only with fully quantized laser models, while the usual semiclassical models clearly fail. The study of such curious devices, particularly by comparing the predictions of theoretical models with experimental observations, can surely generate a lot of interesting insight. This prompted me to write an encyclopedia article on this topic (see the reference above).
This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the RP Photonics Encyclopedia.
Questions and Comments from Users
Here you can submit questions and comments. As far as they get accepted by the author, they will appear above this paragraph together with the author’s answer. The author will decide on acceptance based on certain criteria. Essentially, the issue must be of sufficiently broad interest.
Please do not enter personal data here; we would otherwise delete it soon. (See also our privacy declaration.) If you wish to receive personal feedback or consultancy from the author, please contact him e.g. via e-mail.
By submitting the information, you give your consent to the potential publication of your inputs on our website according to our rules. (If you later retract your consent, we will delete those inputs.) As your inputs are first reviewed by the author, they may be published with some delay.