RP Photonics

Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

VLib
Virtual
Library

The Photonics Spotlight

Frequency Dependence of the Conversion Efficiency for Frequency Doubling

Posted on 2006-09-29 as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)

Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2006_09_29.html

Author: Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Abstract: This article discusses reasons for the fact that nonlinear frequency conversion processes in some crystals, such as frequency doubling, tend to become more efficient if the involved beams have short wavelengths.

Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

Ref.: G. D. Boyd and D. A. Kleinman, “Parametric interaction of focused Gaussian light beams”, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (8), 3597 (1968); encyclopedia articles on nonlinear frequency conversion, frequency doubling, etc.

Did you know why the conversion efficiency for frequency doubling (second-harmonic generation) in a nonlinear crystal has a strong dependence on the pump wavelength? To a minor extent, this is a consequence of the frequency dependence of the nonlinear tensor and the refractive index. In most cases it is more important that common equations for estimating the conversion efficiency contain a factor ω\p2 or even ω\p3, where ω\p is the angular optical frequency of the pump wave. Let's consider the origins of that.

To begin with, the pump field generates a nonlinear polarization, the magnitude of which is proportional to the square of the electric field strength of the pump, and thus proportional to the pump intensity. Here we see no explicit frequency dependence. However, the power radiated by an oscillating electric dipole scales with the square of the oscillation frequency, and the same holds for the harmonic field radiated by the nonlinear polarization. So we have found a factor ω\p2.

But why is there sometimes another factor ω\p? This occurs only in equations which are based on the assumption that the pump wave is a Gaussian beam, which is optimally focused into the nonlinear crystal. This means that the beam radius at the beam waist (typically in the middle of the crystal) is small to obtain high intensities, but not too small, because that would lead to strong beam divergence, reducing the intensity near the end faces. There are actually also some more subtle details involved, related to the Gouy phase shift and discussed in the famous paper of Boyd and Kleinman (see above), but we don't need to consider those. We simply have to realize that a beam with higher frequency has a shorter wavelength and can thus be better focused to a small spot. This just gives another factor of ω\p for the conversion efficiency.

A similar frequency dependence is observed for other processes of nonlinear frequency conversion, even though the situation is a bit more complicated e.g. for non-degenerate optical parametric oscillators where waves with three different frequencies are involved.

The discussed results seem to suggest that nonlinear frequency conversion to very long wavelengths, e.g. in the mid-infrared spectral region, is very hard. However, this is not always so. Nonlinear crystals for such wavelength regions sometimes have a very high nonlinearity. An example is gallium arsenide, which can nowadays be quasi-phase-matched by orientation patterning. Its nonlinearity is much stronger than that of basically all nonlinear crystals which are usually used in the near infrared or visible spectral range.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Comments:

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

arrow