Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

Sponsoring this encyclopedia:     and others

Characterize Your Pump Beam!

Posted on 2007-06-01 as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)

Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2007_06_01.html

Author: , RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Abstract: This article strongly recommends to characterize the intensity profile of the pump beam before building the resonator of an end-pumped laser. Plenty of possible problems can be quickly detected and cured at this early stage, while later on the trouble could be substantial. Having a proper beam profiler in a laser lab is essential, and trying without can be a waste of resources.

Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

Ref.: encyclopedia articles on end pumping, beam profilers

The heading of this article is my “ceterum censeo” in the context of problems with end-pumped solid-state lasers. The origin of that is that often enough I have been dealing with cases where my customer had serious trouble with the performance of his laser, had spent a lot of time, already started to consider all sorts of laborious measures, but had not yet characterized the intensity profile of the pump beam.

Of course, I understand that: At the time when the pump beam is set up, you see no problem coming. You just want to see the operating laser as soon as possible. Once you see that it lases, but with no satisfactory performance even after a lot of tweaking, it would be a bit tedious to remove the laser setup in order to carefully monitor the pump beam profile. After all, you have already invested so much time! And as you wanted to make a nice compact setup, there is not enough space to do that without removing essential parts of the laser. So you continue trying this and that, but make no progress – until you have heard my ceterum censeo often enough to believe it.

Why is the pump beam profile all that important? Assuming that you strive for diffraction-limited beam quality, the size of the pump beam has to match that of the fundamental resonator mode, even though the details are a bit complicated: in high power lasers, you may want to have the pump beam a little larger, in low-power lasers perhaps a bit smaller; I discussed that two months ago, see The Photonics Spotlight 2007-04-01. (If anything is wrong, you may slightly adjust our resonator design instead of reshaping the pump beam profile.) In addition, asymmetries of the pump beam can be detrimental, as they can make the alignment power-dependent and thus more difficult. Moreover, one should try to avoid any “hot spots”, because these can have various adverse effects. But if you don't know about your pump intensity profile, you have no clue what your problem might be. So continue in the dark, or switch the light on! And the next time, you may be sufficiently patient to characterize the pump beam before investing any more work into building your laser.

A nice excuse is that you have no beam profiler in your lab. The simple remedy is then to buy one; an IR card is no substitute in that case, while by borrowing a beam profiler you will at least see that you need it yourself. Yes, a beam profiler or similar camera system does cost some substantial money. However, if you are regularly building lasers, this is less than you can easily waste by not making fast enough progress. In particular, see the article on time to market, which shows how to create the greatest financial damage without spending money.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the RP Photonics Encyclopedia.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.


If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media: