RP Photonics

Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

VLib
Virtual
Library

The Photonics Spotlight

Thermal Equilibrium in Laser Crystals

Posted on 2007-10-31 as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)

Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2007_10_31.html

Author: Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Abstract: The article considers the question in which sense a laser gain medium, such as a laser crystal, is in thermal equilibrium during laser operation.

Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

It is instructive to think about the question whether or not – or better in which sense – a gain medium of a laser, such as a laser crystal, is in thermal equilibrium during laser operation.

Temperature Distribution

The simplest aspect is that of the temperature distribution within the crystal material. Quite obviously, we cannot have thermal equilibrium in this respect, which would mean the same temperature everywhere. That condition would imply zero heat flow, while there is certainly some heat generated in the laser process, and this heat must flow somewhere. Unfortunately, the inevitable temperature gradients give rise to detrimental phenomena such as thermal lensing.

Electronic States

We can also consider the electronic states, first looking only at populations of different Stark level manifolds. In Nd:YAG, for example, we usually have appreciable population densities only in two different states: the metastable upper laser level (4F3/2) and the ground state (4I9/2). In thermal equilibrium, the population of the upper laser level is always smaller than that of the ground state – a population inversion as required for a positive laser gain does not occur, even at very high temperatures. So during laser operation we need to have a non-equilibrium state here. Formally, this can be described as a negative temperature inserted into a Boltzmann distribution, but that doesn't cure the problem that a Boltzmann distribution actually applies only in thermal equilibrium, which we don't have here.

By the way, it is not that the population of the upper laser level would approach 50% at high temperatures (and without optical fields around). Why not? Because both involved Stark level manifolds actually consist of multiple Stark levels, and the ground state manifold (4I9/2) has more of those.

Despite all what has been said above, you can find plenty of Boltzmann factors in the literature on laser models. These then usually apply to the distribution of population over the different Stark levels within the same Stark level manifold. Interestingly, we can easily have a thermal equilibrium within each Stark level manifold, even if there is definitely no thermal equilibrium between those manifolds. This is because phonons (lattice vibrations) induce very rapid transitions between those Stark levels within one manifold, enforcing the equilibrium within picoseconds, while transitions between different level manifolds require much longer time scales. These longer time scales also depend very much on the conditions: they are not that long if the energy difference between two adjacent manifolds is at most a few phonon energies, so that rapid multi-phonon transitions can take place. Otherwise, they can be larger by orders of magnitude.

A Special Case

There are some very special cases, where such a thermal equilibrium between closely spaced Stark level manifolds is not established in time. Consider the amplification of an ultrashort pulse in a laser crystal, with the pulse energy being of the order of the saturation energy or larger. The process of stimulated emission will very rapidly transfer laser-active ions from the upper-state manifold to the manifold of the lower laser level. Multi-phonon processes may not be fast enough to remove the ions from the lower laser level before reabsorption can take place. The result of this is that the saturation of the laser gain is stronger than normal for some short time, and after that the gain partially recovers on a time scale of e.g. a few nanoseconds, depending on the rate of multi-phonon emission. That later gain recovery doesn't help, as the amplified pulse is gone by then. Therefore, the performance e.g. of some regenerative amplifiers is somewhat worse than expected without having that saturation effect in mind. The problem does not occur in continuous-wave operation of the laser crystal, or for smaller pulse energies, or for much longer pulses.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Comments:

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

arrow