RP Photonics logo
RP Photonics
Encyclopedia
Technical consulting services on lasers, nonlinear optics, fiber optics etc.
Profit from the knowledge and experience of a top expert!
Powerful simulation and design software.
Make computer models in order to get a comprehensive understanding of your devices!
Success comes from understanding – be it in science or in industrial development.
The famous Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology – available online for free!
The ideal place for finding suppliers for many photonics products.
Advertisers: Make sure to have your products displayed here!
… combined with a great Buyer's Guide!
VLib part of the
Virtual
Library

The Photonics Spotlight

Johnson–Nyquist Noise in Photodiode Circuits

Ref.: encyclopedia articles on photodiodes and photodetectors

photodiode circuit

Figure 1: A simple electronic circuit for a photodiode.

The simplest electronic circuit (Figure 1) for detecting optical powers with a photodiode consists a voltage source and a resistor R. The voltage source provides some bias voltage to the photodiode, and the resistor converts the generated photocurrent into a voltage, which can then be processed further. Unfortunately, the resistor also introduces some thermal noise, which may limit the sensitivity of our photodetector.

Thermal noise in resistors has been discovered by John B. Johnson in 1928 at Bell Labs, and his colleague Harry Nyquist theoretically explained the phenomenon. There are the two well-known Nyquist equations for calculating the variance of the generated voltage and current noise:

Nyquist formula for Johnson noise

where Δf is the measurement bandwidth. You can reduce the noise, for example, by averaging out fast fluctuations, but this also reduces your measurement bandwidth.

Considerable confusion arises concerning how to use these equations:

I will resolve these issues in the following.

One can describe Johnson noise by replacing the real resistor with an ideal noiseless resistor and a voltage noise source in series, having a voltage variance as described by the first equation above. Alternatively, consider a noiseless resistor with a current noise source in parallel, having a current variance as given by the second equation. Both approaches will lead to the same result, but do not mix them.

It is perhaps more convenient in our case to use the version with the current source. That current source generates a current which simply adds to the photocurrent, as the photodiode can also be considered as a current source: the photocurrent has hardly no dependence on the voltage, as long as there is a sufficiently high bias voltage in reverse direction.

So we see that the thermal noise current directly adds to the photocurrent, thus simulating some noise in the optical power. Clearly, a large value of R is better in this respect, as it reduces the noise current. The caveat is only that a large resistor makes the response slower: the product of the resistor and the capacitance of the photodiode (and possibly from cables) gives you the response time, assuming it is limited by these effects (rather than by carrier velocities in the photodiode, or by subsequent electronics, for example).

Still, the equation above for the noise voltage would seem to suggest the opposite. We can also consider the voltage noise source in series with the resistor. When making R larger, the voltage variance, contaminating our signal, will grow in proportion. However, the signal voltage resulting from the photocurrent also grows in proportion. Overall, the noise gets less harmful, as its power grows in proportion to R, whereas the signal power grows in proportion to the voltage squared and thus to R2. So we have resolved this apparent contradiction.

How about the thermal noise power? The question is too vague: which power?? If nothing is connected to that circuit, there is of course no power delivered by it. The maximum power is extracted when one connects an object having the same impedance R. This implies that half of the currents go into that load, and the voltage is also reduced by one half. The delivered thermal power is then not 4 kBT Δ f, but only kBT Δ f. Now you see where the equations missing the factor of 4 come from: some people consider the extractable powers. Note also that an external load resistor could itself introduce additional thermal noise.

The discussion shows that it is not sufficient to simply have the Nyquist equations while not knowing how to use them. Also, take care with imprecise questions such as “What is the noise power?”. Too much confusion arises in the literature because people are too careless explaining or using equations and arguments.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page, because its location is permanent. See also the Encyclopedia of Laser Physics and Technology.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter.

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Comments:

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

© Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics Consulting GmbH, also at Google+     All rights reserved worldwide
arrow

You have found the Best Place for Your Banner – Here!

Make your

well known with an extra-wide
skyscraper banner
which will be displayed here (with a given probability per page view).

Aspect 1: Huge Traffic

This website is immensely popular – see the detailed statistical data.

For example, your banner gets ≈13'000 views per month if you choose 10% probability per page view.

Aspect 2: Audience

The users of this resource are mostly

  • industry people
  • researchers

working on laser technology and related areas of photonics – exactly those you want to reach.

Aspect 3: Precise Targeting

You can even make the display probability dependent on certain topics – e.g., increase it for pages on lasers!

With our convenient selection tool, this is easy to do.

Which other photonics website can offer that?

Aspect 4: High-quality Environment

Get your banner placed on pages with high-quality content, rather than on pages which are crowed with ads! Our pages give visibility just for you!

Aspect 5: Transparency

On this website, you know exactly on what kind of pages your banner is placed: mostly encyclopedia articles and buyer's guide pages – not some undefined bunch of materials.

We also publish clear statistical data.

Aspect 6: Convenience

Our convenient tool makes it easy for you to define the placement of your banner and to find out the cost.

Also, we deliver a diligent and flexible service, helping you to save time. We even offer to assemble your animated banner!

Aspect 7: Competitive Pricing

Compare our prices with those at other places: we deliver better value for money!

Visit our page on advertising banners to get more details!

– Show all banners –

– Get your own banner! –