Encyclopedia … combined with a great Buyer's Guide!

Sponsoring this encyclopedia:     and others

Mediation in Disputes on Laser Technology

Posted on 2014-01-17 as a part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)

Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2014_01_17.html

Author: , RP Photonics Consulting GmbH

Abstract: Disputes on technical issues with laser technology can lead into expensive and troublesome litigation cases. Generally, mediation or arbitration can give a good chance to resolve issues without going to court. RP Photonics offers arbitration in such cases - alone or in collaboration with a professional arbitrator.

Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta

As in other areas of business, disputes can arise e.g. when some company purchases a laser from some supplier. Frequently, some technical issues are at the core of the dispute. For example, the following types of questions may occur, where the two parties develop conflicting views:

As lasers cost a lot of money, the involved parties may not be perfectly relaxed when discussing such things. In some cases, they end up going to court. However, the resulting litigation is usually not at all satisfying for any party; it costs enormous money and time, does not at all reliably bring the expected results, distracts from the actual focus of the company, and destroys business relations.

It is a good idea in such a situation to seriously try mediation in order to greatly reduce the cost, risk and distraction. A caveat is only: how to find an expert who could act as an mediator? While it is normally quite easy to find out which law court has to be chosen, finding a suitable expert can be difficult. You would like that person to have an indisputable technical competence, and also a reputation and standing such that both parties can trust in his or her honest attempt to be impartial and just.

Mediation belongs to the services I offer. It is not that I am often asked about such things, but it is an area where I can be quite useful (provided, of course, that I don't have too close relations to one of the parties). Although I do not have a formal training in mediation or arbitration, I am familiar with the underlying principles and confident that I can properly handle such cases to the benefit of both parties. If you want a fully professional mediator, I am also happy to work together with that person, complementing the expertise in the technical area.

You may prefer in such a case to first ask an legal adviser. It cannot hurt to know more precisely what your legal position would be. However, note that lawyers earn substantially more money when going through a court case with you. So they may be tempted to make you more optimistic than you should actually be concerning the chances at court. That's different with a mediator, who's explicit task is to find a settlement in a cheaper way. Anyway, your lawyer will also hardly understand the technical issues, so you need a technical expert in any case.

A company's boss may actually believe that the internal technical know-how of the company is sufficient for such purposes. However, an internal expert can obviously not be impartial and thus not convincing for the other party. Even for internal advice, internal experts may get into difficult situations. For example, they may feel uneasy about certain mistakes they did themselves, and thus be somewhat biased witnesses. That may exactly lead to overoptimistic assessments of chances, which can lead into financial disasters. So I would warmly recommend to be careful with that.

This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the RP Photonics Encyclopedia.

Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.


If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media:

How do you rate this article?

Click here to send us your feedback!

Your general impression: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Technical quality: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Usefulness: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent
Readability: don't know poor satisfactory good excellent

Found any errors? Suggestions for improvements? Do you know a better web page on this topic?

Spam protection: (enter the value of 5 + 8 in this field!)

If you want a response, you may leave your e-mail address in the comments field, or directly send an e-mail.

If you enter any personal data, this implies that you agree with storing it; we will use it only for the purpose of improving our website and possibly giving you a response; see also our declaration of data privacy.

If you like our website, you may also want to get our newsletters!

If you like this article, share it with your friends and colleagues, e.g. via social media: