Beam Radius | previous | next | feedback |
Definition: a measure for the transverse extension of a light beam
The definition of the radius of a laser beam with a top-hat profile is trivial, but most light beams have other transverse shapes. A frequently obtained shape is the Gaussian one, where the transverse intensity variation is described with the following equation:
where the beam radius w is the distance from the beam axis where the optical intensity drops to 1/e2 (∼13.5%) of the value on the beam axis. At this radius, the electric field strength drops to 1/e (∼37%) of the maximum value.
For arbitrary (possibly not Gaussian) beam shapes, several different definitions are common. One possibility is still to use the 1/e2 intensity criterion, or a full width at half-maximum (FWHM), or a radius including 86% of the beam energy, etc. The problem with this type of definitions is essentially that the result does not depend on, e.g., how quickly the intensity decays in the wings of the profile. To illustrate this, Figure 1 shows two intensity profiles which have the same FWHM width, although the dashed curve is clearly wider in a meaningful sense. In the case of complicated intensity patterns, it is even more obvious that an FWHM definition cannot be appropriate.
Figure 1: Intensity profiles of two beams which have the same FWHM.
For such reasons (and another reason, which is discussed below), the recommended definition is that of ISO Standard 11146, based on the second moment of the intensity distribution I(x,y). For example, the beam radius in the x direction is
where the coordinates x and y must be taken to be relative to the beam center, i.e., so that the first moments of x and y vanish. For Gaussian beams, the two given definitions lead to the same values, whereas for other beam shapes there can be significant deviations.
The use of a second-moment definition (rather than e.g. a definition based on some 1/e2 intensity criterion) is important particularly when trying to predict the evolution of the beam radius for not diffraction-limited beams. It has been shown that the usual rules for Gaussian beam propagation with a certain M2 factor correctly describe this evolution, whereas errors occur when using beam radii defined in some other way. This is important to observe e.g. when designing the pump optics of a diode-pumped laser, because clearly non-Gaussian beam shapes can occur.
Disadvantages of the second-moment method are that the beam radius calculation is somewhat complicated (it usually requires numerical code), and that the result is easily compromised by some vertical offset in the measured intensity distribution (e.g. caused by ambient light or noise of the camera).
The beam diameter is generally defined as twice the beam radius – no matter what the particular definition of beam radius is. For Gaussian beams, the FWHM beam diameter is 1.18 times the Gaussian beam radius.
For the measurement of beam radii, various kinds of beam profilers exists.
Bibliography
| [1] | H. Kogelnik and T. Li, "Laser beams and resonators", Appl. Opt. 5 (10), 1550 (1966) |
| [2] | P. A. Bélanger, "Beam propagation and the ABCD ray matrices", Opt. Lett. 16 (4), 196 (1991) |
| [3] | ISO Standard 11146 (2005) |
See also: Gaussian beams, beam divergence, beam quality, M2 factor, beam profilers, Spotlight article 2007-07-11
