AI Versus Expert-curated Supplier Directories: How to Reliably Find Photonics Suppliers?
Posted on 2025-12-04 as part of the Photonics Spotlight (available as e-mail newsletter!)
Permanent link: https://www.rp-photonics.com/spotlight_2025_12_04.html
Author: Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta, RP Photonics AG
Abstract: While general-purpose AI tools are useful for language processing and general explanations, they are unreliable for the critical task of finding specialized photonics suppliers. This is because general-purpose AI lacks systematic coverage, uses outdated data, and does not follow well-established systematic procedures. Therefore, expert-curated directories remain the premier, reliable source for complete and accurate supplier discovery in specialized technical fields.
Content quality and neutrality are maintained according to our editorial policy.
The use of AI tools such as ChatGPT has increased enormously — even in areas where one would not have expected it a few years ago. It is therefore natural to ask whether such tools can or should also be used to find suppliers, for example of photonics products. I suppose that many readers have already tried this.
In this article, I discuss whether AI tools will ultimately prevail in this area, or whether expert-curated directories such as the RP Photonics Buyer’s Guide will remain the premier approach.
How AI Tools Gather Information
When using a general-purpose AI tool for supplier search, it helps to understand how such systems obtain and process information. Modern tools based on large language models (LLMs) essentially operate through two distinct mechanisms, each with its own limitations:
1. Knowledge Learned During Training
Large AI models are trained on vast amounts of textual data obtained from the Internet and various licensed sources. During this process, they learn the statistical structure of language as well as a broad range of factual associations. This means that an AI tool may “know” certain suppliers or product categories because it has encountered them somewhere in its training data. However, this knowledge is always incomplete and inevitably becomes outdated, as the training snapshots are months or even years old.
2. Ad-hoc Retrieval of External Information
Some AI systems can access external sources at the time of answering a question. This may involve performing a web search, retrieving the contents of specific web pages, or consulting structured databases. This allows an AI tool to work with more recent information. In practice, however, such retrieval often focuses only on a small number of pages judged relevant by a search engine. It is therefore far from guaranteed that all suitable (or the most relevant) suppliers will be found, or that the AI will base its answer on the most authoritative or complete sources.
Fundamental Limitations
Crucially, in both modes, AI lacks intrinsic technical understanding. It identifies textual patterns but cannot reliably distinguish, for example, between a company that produces a component and one that merely mentions it in an application note. This fundamental limitation explains why, despite fluent language generation, AI systems are unreliable for systematic supplier discovery in a specialized field like photonics.
Further, there is a lot of intrinsic randomness in AI, plus frequent changes of algorithms by AI tools, which the user is usually not aware of. Therefore, the way it works can change at any time in unforeseen ways. This is fundamentally different from applying a well-established systematic procedure for obtaining reliable results.
Another serious issue is that data sources are often not revealed. Do you want to trust someone who provides some critical information without revealing used sources and methods? And who is changing sources and methods in unpredictable ways?
Finally, language models often invent plausible-sounding data, spoiling any reliability of results. Such hallucinations can be reduced, but not reliably avoided, since they are a quite fundamental problem.
Specific Challenges of Supplier Discovery in Photonics
Finding suitable suppliers in photonics is substantially more complex than asking for a general technical explanation. It requires precise classification and reasonably complete coverage of the market — tasks for which general-purpose AI tools are not optimized. Common problems are:
- Misclassification: Closely related product categories are easily mixed up, leading to wrong supplier placement or missing them entirely.
- Ambiguity & terminology: AI struggles with ambiguous website content (production vs. mention) and may overlook suppliers using uncommon terminology.
- Incomplete coverage: Like a general web search, AI can easily miss some of the best suppliers, which is critical for high-value, specialized purchases.
These issues — in addition to outdated data and hallucinations — demonstrate that while fluent text generation may produce a great impression, it does not automatically translate into dependable supplier discovery, especially in a specialized field like photonics.
How Expert-curated Directories Work
Specialized supplier directories are built with the specific needs of photonics users in mind, and with specific expertise. Their structure and maintenance methods directly address problems like those explained above:
- Accurate classification of products and consistent terminology are (in case of a high-quality resource) based on expert knowledge and obtained data on real product offerings. Suppliers are assigned to product categories only when they actually offer those products, avoiding misclassifications.
- Comprehensive and continuously updated coverage results from continuous work on data updates, improving classifications, etc. — not just a quick effort in the moment someone asks a question.
- Integration with technical background information is a special quality of the RP Photonics Buyer’s Guide: Supplier listings are closely integrated with encyclopedia articles and other technical resources. Users therefore have immediate access to authoritative explanations that help in evaluating product types and supplier capabilities.
Overall, expert-curated high-quality directories offer the completeness, precision, and technical consistency that engineers need when making sourcing decisions — qualities that general-purpose AI tools currently cannot guarantee.
By the way, we also substantially use AI for our resources — we don't present just old-fashioned static lists, exact-match searches and the like: There are search filters, semantic search, etc. For example, if you are not sure about the proper name of the category you search for, just enter what you think, and it will present a list of most closely related categories. (We have a list of AI-based features for users and one for advertisers). And in the background, we also use AI a lot — for example, for extensive quality checks. So you don't choose between AI or RP Photonics: We give you both expert content and AI-powered improvements.
Of course, human-curated directories are not automatically of high quality. For example, there are attempts to generate easy income without significant investment — for example, not engaging photonic experts but only cheap employees who have little understanding of the field.
Don't AI Tools Also Utilize Curated Directories?
Indeed, they do. In practice, however, this happens only to a limited extent and in ways that are not guaranteed to produce reliable results. They may start using only some more or less outdated training data before doing additional web searches when recognizing that the user needs more. If you send the same prompt multiple times, the AI may use a directory in one case but rely on different sources or even on other search and filter strategies in another. In that sense, the results can be even more variable than with a Google search, where at least the current rankings provide some limited consistency.
Moreover, retrieval-based AIs typically do not explore directories systematically. They may look at only a few pages suggested by a search engine and can easily misinterpret the content, for example by overlooking the structure of product categories or by drawing incorrect conclusions from short descriptions.
Therefore, it may well be that the results presented by an AI tool are influenced by what it found in the RP Photonics Buyer’s Guide, but there is no guarantee of consistency or completeness.
Conclusions
AI tools have amazing strengths — particularly in producing high-quality, fluent language (that's what LLMs were made for!) and in helping to explain or summarize complex topics. However, they can hardly replace an expert-curated directory when it comes to critical tasks such as systematically finding suitable suppliers in a specialized field like photonics.
The main reasons are structural: General-purpose AIs do not control their data sources, do not systematically use directory structures, and cannot guarantee completeness, correctness and consistency of supplier listings. Those are precisely the aspects where curated resources excel.
It is therefore likely that this situation will persist. AI tools will increasingly become useful companions for understanding technologies and formulating requirements, while expert-curated directories such as the RP Photonics Buyer’s Guide will remain the primary, reliable basis for supplier discovery. Professional work requires reliable data sources and consistently applied procedures, not some quasi-random bits and pieces.
Combining both approaches can also be effective — for example, checking with AI whether you can find more suppliers, or clarifying certain details. But for dependable sourcing decisions, the curated resource should come first. (Unless, of course, the AI tool is programmed to consistently use a specific high-quality data source.) Power users of AI understand how AI works, what its limitations are, and where to use other tools for best results.
Of course, AI will continue to improve in many respects. However, some limitations are fundamental. In particular, the quality and reliability of well-curated specialist directories are unlikely to be matched by general-purpose AI systems (which is also not really their goal). In fact, improvement of an AI system may well mean a better understanding of its own limits and a greater tendency to refer users to more appropriate tools rather than attempting tasks for which its results are unlikely to be reliable. After all, their core task is to serve users well.
By the way, as it is certainly in the interest of the photonics community that high-quality resources like those offered by RP Photonics will remain usable for many years to come, it is a good idea to use them consistently not only for your immediate benefit. How about making a bookmark in your browser's toolbar now?
You may also want to read the RP Photonics Spotlight article of 2025-02-27 titled Tools from RP Photonics for Responsible Purchasing. Responsible purchasing is more than just starting a search tool; it must involve more steps, e.g. getting clarity on the requirements and checking all relevant suppliers against those requirements.
This article is a posting of the Photonics Spotlight, authored by Dr. Rüdiger Paschotta. You may link to this page and cite it, because its location is permanent. See also the RP Photonics Encyclopedia.
Note that you can also receive the articles in the form of a newsletter or with an RSS feed.
